- 11 Sep 2018
- 1 min read
Section 377 verdict: Navtej Johar vs Union of India opens doors for broader rights for the LGBTQ community
This opinion was published in Firstpost on September 11, 2018.
About the Authors
Namrata was a Research Fellow at Vidhi.
Queer-Feminist Reflections on the Marriage Equality Case in India: Navigating Challenges for Equality and Inclusion
Exploring the Stakes: Understanding the Marriage Equality Case before the Supreme Court of India
Explained: Advocate Karuna Nundy’s significant arguments on marriage equality
Advocate Karuna Nundy presents two constitutionally compliant principles to balance the interests of women and transgender people in the marriage equality debate and demonstrates how the government of India’s core argument against marriage equality is weak based on the government’s own past record
Revisiting American Queer Legal History
Privacy & Cookies Policy