Illustration of a winding workflow or decision-making process. A white curved path connects several icons: a document with a pen, a judge with a gavel, multiple checklist boards marked with blue dots, speech bubbles representing discussion, a lightbulb for ideas, documents flowing into buildings and people, a computer chip or network symbol, and a raised hand holding a protest sign. Blue circular markers appear along the path, suggesting stages in a process or timeline.

QUERY

A Framework for the Periodic Review of Legislation to Assess Quality, Effectiveness, and Relevance

Indian laws often withstand the test of time, but continue to wither with its passage. As a direct result, they may become outdated, poorly implemented, or misaligned with their objectives. A constitutional democracy like ours should remain responsive and systematic in its approach to examining and amending the law, rather than treating it as an exercise purely for  judicial review or reactive amendment.

Against this backdrop, this report proposes QUERY, a framework for the post-enactment review of legislation based on three dimensions: Quality, Effectiveness, and Relevance. The framework is designed to help civil society and governments alike, providing them with 70- and 90-point scoring toolkits, and accompanying methodology, for evaluating any law.

The Core 70-point toolkit consists of 7 metrics:
(A) SARAL drafting (Simplicity, Accessibility, and Rationality)
(B) Legal and Constitutional Compliance
(C) Efficacy in Meeting Objectives
(D) Implementation
(E) Stakeholder Response and Feedback Mechanisms
(G) Technological and Scientific Relevance
(H) Social and Cultural Integration.

The Core+ 90-point toolkit delves even deeper, providing for metrics that rely on limited-access data points, namely (I) Enforcement and Administrative Feasibility and (J) Impact Assessment and Stakeholder Engagement.

To pilot test the framework, the report applies it on two central laws: the Registration Act, 1908 and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (‘PoSH Act’). Through these case studies, the report demonstrates that both older and newer laws require systematic review: while the Registration Act remains legally indispensable, its procedural design is outdated; and while the PoSH Act performs better in many metrics, it continues to face gaps in implementation, coverage, and institutional responsiveness.

Drawing on comparative practices and Indian constitutional principles, the report identifies pathways for operationalising periodic review through government, legislative, and civil society action. It seeks to embed a culture of evidence-based legislative maintenance, so that laws continue to remain responsive instruments of good governance.