Exploring the Stakes: Understanding the Marriage Equality Case before the Supreme Court of India

Advocate Karuna Nundy presents two constitutionally compliant principles to balance the interests of women and transgender people in the marriage equality debate and demonstrates how the government of India’s core argument against marriage equality is weak based on the government’s own past record

Lessons from Baehr v. Lewin (1993) and United States v. Windsor (2013) that bolster the demand for judicial intervention in the ongoing marriage equality case in India

This post is part of the #VidhiBeyondMarriageEquality series, and examines misplaced arguments about the “elitist” nature of demands for marriage equality in India

Challenging the incest trope in the marriage equality case

The Parliament, Judiciary and Executive must collaborate to ensure the fundamental rights of the queer community are acknowledged and respected

There is no absolute concept of a 'man' or a 'woman'

Namrata and Shreyashi trace the developments in the marriage equality litigation and bring to light issues and claims from queer activists that go beyond marriage equality

In this piece, Kanav N Sahgal responds to Professors G.S. Bajpai and Ankit Kaushik’s arguments against judicial intervention on the issue of same sex marriage. He argues why the court, and not the parliament, is the appropriate forum to decide the issue