Rediscovering Discovery and Inspection
Consultation series to modernise civil litigation in India’s District Judiciary
Civil litigation in India is hampered by outdated court practices, unchecked frivolous litigations, and frequent adjournments, making the system unsuited for the 21st Century. The judicial system requires a significant overhaul to modernise and streamline processes. The Civil Rules of Practice (“CRP”) promulgated by each High Court combined with the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (“CPC”), govern civil litigation practice in district courts of India. While amendments to CPC, a centralised legislation will take considerable time and effort, the state level CRP can and should be modernised on a priority basis. In most states these rules are outdated and obstructive to modern technology integration.
This consultation series therefore aims to modernise civil litigation in India’s District Judiciary through the formulation of a Model Civil Rules of Practice. To achieve this, each paper in the series comprehensively looks into a specific stage in the lifecycle of a civil suit, questions the current processes and reimagines them with technology and simplified legal rules at its core.
Streamlining trials through discovery and inspection
Section 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“CPC”) empowers the court to order the discovery, inspection, and production of documents either on its own accord or if applied for by a party. This means that the court can obtain information, including documentary evidence that has not been made part of the record by the opposite party/parties. The process of discovery and inspection, therefore, has the potential to expedite trials. Further, by facilitating this exchange of information, ‘discovery’ promotes transparency, and ensures that there is no “trial by ambush”. Discovery and inspection, however, remain underutilised in the process of civil litigation. This consultation paper details the procedure governing discovery and inspection, highlights their importance and offers solutions to promote their greater usage in civil litigation.

