This opinion was published in The Telegraph on October 19, 2022.
About the Authors
Arghya is the Founder and Research Director at Vidhi. His areas of specialisation are constitutional law and regulation of the digital economy. He has served on a number of government committees including the B.N. Srikrishna-led committee of experts on a data protection framework for India. Arghya has a number of academic publications on the Supreme Court and the Constitution in leading law journals such as Law Quarterly Review and Public Law. He is also a columnist at The Telegraph and The Times of India. He has most recently authored a book “Independence and Accountability of the Indian Higher Judiciary” (Cambridge, 2019) which builds on his doctoral work at Oxford University. Prior to founding Vidhi, he was at Oxford as a Lecturer in Administrative Law at Pembroke College.
Backwards vs Forwards
Too many quotas are bad for Bharat – Dissenting judges in EWS case warn against chopping the public sphere into narrow sectarian slices
View: SC verdict on EWS Quota Reveals How Discrimination Law in India is in Disarray
The Constitution has a prohibition on discrimination on the ground of caste and violating this would be a violation of the basic structure of the Constitution.
Freebies Debate Highlights the Limits of Judicial Overreach
The remit of election freebies could, potentially, prompt a discussion around what a framework for political party regulation in India can be, in order to secure transparency and accountability in electoral democracy.Privacy & Cookies Policy