This opinion was published in The Hindu on January 18, 2018.
About the Authors
Arghya is the Founder and Research Director at Vidhi. His areas of specialisation are constitutional law and regulation of the digital economy. He has served on a number of government committees including the B.N. Srikrishna-led committee of experts on a data protection framework for India. Arghya has a number of academic publications on the Supreme Court and the Constitution in leading law journals such as Law Quarterly Review and Public Law. He is also a columnist at The Telegraph and The Times of India. He has most recently authored a book “Independence and Accountability of the Indian Higher Judiciary” (Cambridge, 2019) which builds on his doctoral work at Oxford University. Prior to founding Vidhi, he was at Oxford as a Lecturer in Administrative Law at Pembroke College.
Digitisation of courts brings privacy concerns. But India lacks right to be forgotten
The policy should address how courts deal with privacy concerns. It's important to not wait till PDP Bill is enacted
Why Indian justice system needs prosecutors to work with police during probe
A prosecutor is forced to proceed even if they believe the evidence collected by the police isn't sufficient. This hampers their ability to take the case to its logical end
Judicial reform should be rooted in empirical evidence, not political prattle
AIJS, cloaked as a judicial reform, is, however, a political gimmick that aims to transfer the recruitment and appointment of district judges from high courts and state governments to a centralised system akin to All India Civil ServicesPrivacy & Cookies Policy