This opinion was published in The Hindu on November 15, 2017.
About the Authors
Arghya is the Founder and Research Director at Vidhi. His areas of specialisation are constitutional law and regulation of the digital economy. He has served on a number of government committees including the B.N. Srikrishna-led committee of experts on a data protection framework for India. Arghya has a number of academic publications on the Supreme Court and the Constitution in leading law journals such as Law Quarterly Review and Public Law. He is also a columnist at The Telegraph and The Times of India. He has most recently authored a book “Independence and Accountability of the Indian Higher Judiciary” (Cambridge, 2019) which builds on his doctoral work at Oxford University. Prior to founding Vidhi, he was at Oxford as a Lecturer in Administrative Law at Pembroke College.
Chronic Delays in POCSO Cases are Eroding the Future of India’s Children
Delays in Pocso cases adversely impact the accused (since getting bail in such cases can be extremely difficult) and the child victims (who are re-traumatised by a lengthy trial)
Why ‘Publicity Interest Litigations’ Are Wearying Indian Courts
Last week, the Supreme Court dismissed a plea seeking the opening of certain rooms of the Taj Mahal and called it a ‘publicity interest litigation’. Here’s a look at how the misuse of PILs is affecting the judicial system
Are Constitution Bench Matters Really Out of the ‘Cold Storage’?
Why only certain five-judge bench matters have been chosen and why certain others have been left out raises certain questions.Privacy & Cookies Policy