Collective Submissions to the Jane Kaushik Committee

On August 24, 2026, the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy and the Keshav Suri Foundation convened a closed-door panel and workshop at The LaLit, New Delhi, bringing together transgender and intersex community members, civil society organisations, lawyers, academics and healthcare professionals to deliberate on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026 (‘Amendment Act’). The discussion was guided by the themes in Vidhi’s report, ‘The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026: What Can State Governments Do?’ and its accompanying advocacy toolkit.

The inputs that emerged have been consolidated into a collective submission to the Advisory Committee chaired by Justice Asha Menon, constituted by the Supreme Court in Jane Kaushik v. Union of India (2025). The submission is made jointly by a collective that lent their names to the consultations.

To protect the privacy of the organisations and individuals these names have been redacted in the submission attached. 

The submission records the on-ground impact of the Amendment Act as reported by stakeholders across five themes: (a) lived experience as evidence, (b) self-identification and gender identity, (c) healthcare and privacy, (d) impact of the new offences, and (e) dialogue between the State and the community.

Key concerns include:

  • the conflation of intersex status with transgender identity, and the erasure of transgender men, non-binary and genderqueer persons from the narrowed definition,
  • the suspension of transgender identity card applications, and the card being treated as a proxy for identity by police and institutions,
  • delay and discontinuation of gender-affirming and routine healthcare despite the untouched duty to provide discrimination free healthcare under Section 15 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019,
  • a data-sharing mandate with no prescribed format, purpose or safeguards which risks the right to privacy of transgender persons,  in contrast to existing health reporting regimes, and
  • vague new offences that conflate legitimate medical care with criminal harm and are already being invoked against civil society organisations and transgender families. 

**We would like to thank Ishanika Sharma and Tooba Shahid, who interned at Vidhi, for their valuable assistance with this project.

Filed Under