- 20 Apr 2023
- 1 min read
Same-Sex Marriages in India: The Case for Judicial Intervention
In this piece, Kanav N Sahgal responds to Professors G.S. Bajpai and Ankit Kaushik’s arguments against judicial intervention on the issue of same sex marriage. He argues why the court, and not the parliament, is the appropriate forum to decide the issue
This opinion was published in Law School Policy Review & Kautilya Society on April 20, 2023.
About the Authors
Kanav N Sahgal is Samvidhaan Fellowship Programme Manager at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy and Communications Manager at Nyaaya. He holds a Master's in Development from Azim Premji University, Bengaluru and specializes in global gender politics and the law- with a focus on gay rights and abortion rights. Kanav also has extensive experience in the domains of development communications, programme management, human resources management, social media management, content writing, and on-ground advocacy. He has worked for NGOs, not-for-profits, and for-profits engaged in the following domains: international development (monitoring and evaluation), environment and social consulting, student leadership development, anti-human trafficking, and LGBTQIA+ advocacy. Kanav writes extensively for the media and is a regular columnist for national and international platforms as diverse as The Hindu, Deccan Herald, The Diplomat Magazine, Cosmopolitan India, JURIST, The LSE Review of Books, and The Cambridge Global Affair among others.
Queer-Feminist Reflections on the Marriage Equality Case in India: Navigating Challenges for Equality and Inclusion
Exploring the Stakes: Understanding the Marriage Equality Case before the Supreme Court of India
Explained: Advocate Karuna Nundy’s significant arguments on marriage equality
Advocate Karuna Nundy presents two constitutionally compliant principles to balance the interests of women and transgender people in the marriage equality debate and demonstrates how the government of India’s core argument against marriage equality is weak based on the government’s own past record
Revisiting American Queer Legal History
Privacy & Cookies Policy