- 1 Nov 2021
- 1 min read
‘Justice now depends on technology,’ said SA Bobde. Indian judiciary has miles to go
Legal acumen doesn't translate to tech competence. We need adequate training to transit from paper briefs to screens
This opinion was published in The Print on November 01, 2021.
About the Authors
Reshma is a Senior Resident Fellow working in the area of Judicial Reforms. Her work focuses on systemic issues in the judiciary such as infrastructure, judicial selection (AIJS) and training, and tribunalisation. She is currently involved in interdisciplinary projects addressing the need for effective modern solutions to promote accessibility and agility of the judiciary, including the re-thinking of courtroom architecture and digitisation of the judicial process. She takes a keen interest in data design, enrichment and visualisation. Reshma graduated with a BA, LLB (Hons.) from the National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Cochin in 2015. Prior to joining Vidhi, she was an in-house counsel in the legal compliance function of a leading Indian technology company.
Digitisation of courts brings privacy concerns. But India lacks right to be forgotten
The policy should address how courts deal with privacy concerns. It's important to not wait till PDP Bill is enacted
Why Indian justice system needs prosecutors to work with police during probe
A prosecutor is forced to proceed even if they believe the evidence collected by the police isn't sufficient. This hampers their ability to take the case to its logical end
Judicial reform should be rooted in empirical evidence, not political prattle
AIJS, cloaked as a judicial reform, is, however, a political gimmick that aims to transfer the recruitment and appointment of district judges from high courts and state governments to a centralised system akin to All India Civil ServicesPrivacy & Cookies Policy