- 26 Sep 2021
- 1 min read
How the Karnataka High Court missed the forests for the trees
Certain remarks of Karnataka High Court in the Cauvery Calling case are controversial not only because of a poor understanding of ecology but may also leave a negative impact on environmental jurisprudence
This opinion was published in Bar and Bench on September 26, 2021.
About the Authors
Debadityo is a Senior Resident Fellow and is leading projects related to the implementation of key environmental legislations and judgments. His research interest lies on the intersection of ecology, law and policy. He graduated with B.Sc. (Hons) in Zoology from the University of Delhi in 2009 and completed M.Sc. (Tech.) Environmental Science & Technology from Banaras Hindu University in 2012. He has also undertaken training on Tropical Forest Restoration from Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies in 2016. He has over 9 years of professional experience in issues related to environment and wildlife protection. In the past, he has worked with organizations like Vikram A. Sarabhai Community Science Centre, Legal Initiative for Forest & Environment, WWF-India, Wildlife Trust of India and several grassroots organizations. He is founder and trustee of Vindhyan Ecology and Natural History Foundation (since 2012). He is a recipient of the Sanctuary Wildlife Service Award' (2019) and is member of IUCN-Species Survival Commission’s Bear Specialist Group and EKOenergy network, Helsinki. Debadityo has also initiated litigations in the National Green Tribunal on issues related to environmental clearance, declaration of eco-sensitive zones and compensation for environmental damage.
Putting the Spotlight on Invasive Alien and Native Species
Why the Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Bill 2021 misses the target despite good intentionsPrivacy & Cookies Policy