This opinion was published in DakshIndia on September 03, 2015.
About the Authors
Alok Prasanna Kumar is Co-Founder and Lead, Vidhi Karnataka. His areas of research include judicial reforms, Constitutional law, urban development, and law and technology. He graduated with a B.A. LL.B. (Hons) from the NALSAR University in 2008 and obtained the BCL from the University of Oxford in 2009. He writes a monthly column for the Economic and Political Weekly and has published in the Indian Journal of Constitutional Law and National Law School of India Review apart from media outlets such as The Hindu, Indian Express, Scroll, Quint and Caravan. He has practiced in the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court from the chambers of Mr Mohan Parasaran, and currently also co-hosts the Ganatantra podcast on IVM Podcasts.
Digitisation of courts brings privacy concerns. But India lacks right to be forgotten
The policy should address how courts deal with privacy concerns. It's important to not wait till PDP Bill is enacted
Why Indian justice system needs prosecutors to work with police during probe
A prosecutor is forced to proceed even if they believe the evidence collected by the police isn't sufficient. This hampers their ability to take the case to its logical end
Judicial reform should be rooted in empirical evidence, not political prattle
AIJS, cloaked as a judicial reform, is, however, a political gimmick that aims to transfer the recruitment and appointment of district judges from high courts and state governments to a centralised system akin to All India Civil ServicesPrivacy & Cookies Policy